Text

acidpunch:

still laughing about yesterday during gender/sexuality studies class when our professor had everyone chant “VAGINA! PENIS! VAGINA!” a few times to make us more comfortable with saying those terms

and this girl just stands up slowly and says “…this… this isn’t math class…”

(via distressedwhale)

Source: acidpunch
Text

princeowl:

'romeo and juliet but with gnomes instead of people with music by elton john' isnt a movie that you'd think exists but it does 

(via distressedwhale)

Source: princeowl
Photo Set

elysemarshall:

buzzfeed:

Turns out the world isn’t such a bad place after all. 

Timely reminder that people are inherently good.

(via distressedwhale)

Source: BuzzFeed
Photo
kinkstertime:

the-uncalm-nipples:

nodaybuttodaytodefygravity:

nateriot:

Obama on gay adoption 


yeah totally ruining this country what a horrible guy

Fun fact: Obama has attempted to fix almost everything that he promised to fix, but the republicans have voted almost all of his bills out of congress. He’s not the problem.

That fact isn’t very fun

kinkstertime:

the-uncalm-nipples:

nodaybuttodaytodefygravity:

nateriot:

Obama on gay adoption 

image

yeah totally ruining this country what a horrible guy

Fun fact: Obama has attempted to fix almost everything that he promised to fix, but the republicans have voted almost all of his bills out of congress. He’s not the problem.

That fact isn’t very fun

(via youngbloodinc)

Source: holymaurymotherofgod
Photo Set
Photo Set
Text

invisiblechickens:

twigfingers:

bornforthismiserybusiness:

profoak:

how does porn make money if i can literally just search free porn

How do musicians make money when you can literally just download free music?

Musicians make a lot of money from touring

when’s the last time you went to a live porn concert

yesterday with ur mom

(via distressedwhale)

Photo

verylittlebird:

this is the sort of web content i am looking to see every day

(via distressedwhale)

Source: best-pics-gifs.com
Photo
hellhoundsonthehunt:

paradoxicallygrey:

sincereglomp:

a) how will you cut your nails
b) how will you remove it

c) Why would you do this

d) what made them decide 53 was the place to stop

hellhoundsonthehunt:

paradoxicallygrey:

sincereglomp:

a) how will you cut your nails

b) how will you remove it

c) Why would you do this

d) what made them decide 53 was the place to stop

(via distressedwhale)

Source: melaninacorpse
Link

This is why you shouldn't click on the naked photos of Jennifer Lawrence

fabulouslyfreespirited:

If you deliberately seek out any of these images, you are directly participating in the violation not just of numerous women’s privacy but also of their bodies.
In what’s being called the biggest celebrity hacking incident in internet history, more than 100 female celebrities have had their private nude images stolen and published online. The bulk of the images posted have been officially confirmed as belonging to Jennifer Lawrence, but a complete list of victims’ names - including Krysten Ritter, Kate Upton, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Rihanna, Brie Larson and Kirsten Dunst - has been subsequently published. (Link does not contain pictures, only names.)
The images were first uploaded by an anonymous member of the underground internet sewer known as 4chan and have since been enthusiastically shared across platforms like Reddit and Twitter. A representative for Lawrence has confirmed the images are real, condemning the theft of them as a “flagrant violation of privacy” and adding that “The authorities have been contacted and will prosecute anyone who posts the stolen photos.”
There are a few different issues that a criminal act like this brings up, but before I get into them it’s necessary to make one thing clear: If you deliberately seek out any of these images, you are directly participating in the violation not just of numerous women’s privacy but also of their bodies. These images - which I have not seen and which I will not look for - are intimate, private moments belonging only to the people who appear in them and who they have invited to see them. To have those moments stolen and broadcast to the world is an egregious act of psychic violence which constitutes a form of assault.
The people sharing these images are perpetuating an ongoing assault. The people gleefully looking at them are witnessing and enjoying an ongoing assault. When you have been asked by victims of a crime like this not to exacerbate the pain of that crime and you continue to do so anyway, you are consciously deciding that your enjoyment, your rights and perhaps even just your curiosity are more important than the safety and dignity of the people you’re exploiting.
That out of the way, let’s get a few other things straight.
1. This is not a ‘scandal’
It’s a crime, and we should be discussing it as such. Some media outlets are salaciously reporting it otherwise, as if the illegal violation of privacy involving intimate images is little more than subject for gossip. When associated with sex, the word ‘scandal’ has been typically interpreted as something that assigns responsibility to all parties involved, a consensual act unfortunately discovered and for which everyone owes an explanation or apology. Remember when private nude photos of Vanessa Hudgens (whose name also appears on the list of victims) were leaked online and Disney forced her to publicly apologise for her “lapse in judgment” and hoped she had “learned a valuable lesson”? Never mind that Hudgens was an adult and a victim of privacy violation - the ‘scandal’ was painted as something for which she owed her fans an apology. Which leads us to:
2. These women do not ‘only have themselves to blame’
While depressing, it’s sadly unsurprising to see some people arguing that Lawrence et al brought this on themselves. Part of living in a rape culture is the ongoing expectation that women are responsible for protecting themselves from abuse, and that means avoiding behaviour which might be later ‘exploited’ by the people who are conveniently never held to account for their actions. But women are entitled to consensually engage in their sexuality any way they see fit. If that involves taking nude self portraits for the enjoyment of themselves or consciously selected others, that’s their prerogative.
Victims of crime do not have an obligation to accept dual responsibility for that crime. Women who take nude photographs of themselves are not committing a criminal act, and they shouldn’t ‘expect’ to become victims to one, as actress Mary E. Winstead pointed out on Twitter. 
Sending a photograph of your breasts to one person isn’t consenting to having the whole world see those breasts, just as consenting to sex with one person isn’t the same as giving permission for everyone else to fu*k you. Victim blaming isn’t okay, even if it does give you a private thrill to humiliate the female victims of sexual exploitation.
3. It doesn’t matter that ‘damn, she looks good and should own it!’
Stealing and sharing the private photographs of women doesn’t become less of a crime just because you approve them for fapping activity. I’m sure many of the women on this list are confident of their sexual attractiveness. It doesn’t mean they don’t value their privacy or shouldn’t expect to enjoy the same rights to it as everyone else. It also doesn’t mean they want strangers sweating over their images. That line of thinking comes from the same school which instructs women to either ignore of welcome sexual harassment when it’s seemingly ‘positive’ in its sentiments.
None of these women are likely to give a shit that you think their bodies are ‘tight, damn’. Despite what society reinforces to us about the public ownership of women’s bodies, we are not entitled to co-opt and objectify them just because we think we can defend it as a compliment.
I will not be seeking out these images out and I urge everyone else to avoid doing the same. I hope that all the women who have been victimised here are being appropriately supported by the authorities and their network of friends. And I hope sincerely that more people take a stand against this kind of behaviour.
Because this incident aside, it strikes me as deeply ironic that we will vehemently protest a free Facebook messenger app because we’re outraged at reports that it can access our phone’s numbers, and yet turn around and excuse the serving up of women’s bodies for our own pleasure. Our appreciation is no less disgusting just because it’s accompanied by the sound of one hand clapping.

(via collidewithluigi)

Source: fabulouslyfreespirited
Photo Set

rawr2811:

starksborn:

toodutchforyou:

Tell me again why we don’t need feminism.

this is so fucking gross

but is this bra available for purchase tho

Boobs were made to feed babies, butts were made to sit on. Neither one is for men. However, men can enjoy this about women, that isn’t wrong at all. It’s wrong when men act like that the ONLY FUNCTION of a woman’s body part is for them; any part really, not just the ones I mentioned. This is MY body not THEIRS.

(via distressedwhale)

Source: toodutchforyou
Photo

kaesworld:

The realist shit ever

(via distressedwhale)

Source: doodlepoop
Photo
Text

taylorswiftmademefearless:

stydiaofficial:

if you don’t think some of the hate Taylor Swift receives is unnecessary and sexist let me just remind you that she once wore a black turtle neck, jeans and boots and this was a result

image

image

scandalous wow cover your eyes

(via alexernst)

Source: stydiaofficial
Photo Set

awhovianshaven:

disneybakerdcp:

pitchblack-youcant-kill-fear:

quimbycub:

askpablez94:

sexykangaya:

WHAT THE FUCK

she had period and the blood attracted the damned shark OMG THAT’S BEST AD EVER

That escalated quickly.

At first I was like: Oh. Okay, look… sexy ladies.

*scrolls*

But then I was like: Oh. Oh my.

if you’re a female and this scenario doesn’t cross your mind at least once every summer, you must be either under the age of like 12 or older than 50

My roommate said “WHAT COUNTRY IS THAT COMMERCIAL FROM” and my other two roommates just said “Probably Australia” in unison

(via youngbloodinc)

Source: handsinacabitches